Overview

This trial is active, not recruiting.

Condition choledocholithiasis
Treatments endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation, endoscopic sphincterotomy
Sponsor National Taiwan University Hospital
Start date March 2006
End date May 2006
Trial identifier NCT00329888, 9561703024

Summary

Compare endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation vs. endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in:

- when sphincterotomy is difficult (periampullary diverticulum, prior sphincterotomy or Billroth II anastomosis)

- when there is distal CBD tapering.

United States No locations recruiting
Other Countries No locations recruiting

Study Design

Observational model defined population
Time perspective cross-sectional

Eligibility Criteria

Male or female participants of any age.

Inclusion Criteria: - Choledocholithiasis with - Difficult sphincterotomy:periampullary diverticulum, prior sphincterotomy or Billroth II anastomosis - or distal CBD tapering. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients in whom no endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation or endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for lithotripsy

Additional Information

Official title Comparison of Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation and Sphincterotomy for CBD Stones With Difficult Sphincterotomy or Distal CBD Tapering
Principal investigator Wei Chih Liao, MD.
Description Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation is an alternative to endoscopic sphincterotomy for treating bile duct stones: - easier and as effective. But... - a higher risk of pancreatitis. Conditions including periampullary diverticulum, prior EST, Billroth-II anastomosis, or distal CBD tapering pose difficulty in EST and lithotripsy with increased risk of complications. Whether EPBD or EST is superior in efficacy or safety under such circumstances is not clear.
Trial information was received from ClinicalTrials.gov and was last updated in May 2006.
Information provided to ClinicalTrials.gov by National Taiwan University Hospital.